Supreme Court will hear Trump's proposed limits on birthright citizenship

David G. Savage, Los Angeles Times on Apr 17, 2025

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court announced Thursday it will hear arguments in May on President Trump's proposed limits on birthright citizenship.

But it was not clear whether the justices would weigh in on the constitutionality of Trump's proposal or instead decide only whether it can be blocked nationwide by a federal judge acting on behalf of a few plaintiffs.

On his first day in office, Trump proposed to revise the 14th Amendment's promise that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

Under Trump's proposal, babies born in this country would not be deemed U.S. citizens if neither the mother nor the father was a citizen or a lawful permanent resident at the time of the birth.

The proposal was challenged as unconstitutional based on the words and history of the 14th Amendment, and three judges have struck it down nationwide. Those judges in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state ruled based on lawsuits filed by individuals, groups and 22 states.

Trump's lawyers said those rulings went too far. They appealed to the Supreme Court on procedural grounds and made what they described as "a modest request." They said the justices should rein in federal district judges and limit their power to make nationwide rulings.

If the justices were to agree, however, it could clear the way to enforce Trump's new citizenship rules in many parts of the nation, even while the constitutionality of his plan remained in doubt.

Several justices have voiced skepticism over district judges handing down rulings that set a national rule. But others have questioned the notion of a constitutional revision that goes into effect in some states and not others.

Thursday's brief order suggests the justices are closely split on how to proceed. They said they will hear arguments on May 15 and would likely issue a decision by late June.

_____