BOSTON — A Massachusetts federal judge has temporarily blocked cuts to health care research funding for universities and scientific institutions after 22 state attorneys general Andrea Campbell sued the Trump administration on Monday.

The AGs filed the lawsuit against the Trump administration, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the National Institutes of Health over the funding cuts.

They are challenging the Trump administration’s attempt to cut “indirect cost” reimbursements at every research institution throughout the country. These reimbursements cover expenses to facilitate biomedical research, like labs, faculty, infrastructure and utility costs.

“Massachusetts is home to universities and research institutions that lead our country in saving lives and creating jobs,” Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, who was part of the lawsuit, posted Monday on social media.

“Trump’s NIH cuts put them at risk,” the AG wrote. “We won’t allow this Administration to play politics with our public health or undermine our economy. We’re suing.”

Less than six hours after the AG coalition’s lawsuit was filed in Massachusetts U.S. District Court in Boston, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against the NIH. That means the funding cuts cannot immediately go into effect; there will be a court hearing on the case Feb. 21.

“The Court’s swift action provides immediate relief to research and public health institutions throughout the Commonwealth,” Campbell said in a statement. “This is an initial victory for every person and family counting on the life saving science funded by federal grants. I will not stop fighting for the people of Massachusetts, for their health care, and for the rule of law.”

The NIH on Friday announced that it would slash indirect cost rates to 15% of grants. This would lead to major budget gaps for universities and research institutions, and likely trigger the suspension of clinical trials, layoffs, and lab closures, according to the AGs.

“Last year, $9B of the $35B that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) granted for research was used for administrative overhead, what is known as ‘indirect costs,’ ” the NIH posted on Friday. “Today, NIH lowered the maximum indirect cost rate research institutions can charge the government to 15%, above what many major foundations allow and much lower than the 60%+ that some institutions charge the government today. This change will save more than $4B a year effective immediately.”

Harvard’s NIH indirect rate has been 69%.

This suit is being co-led by Campbell and the AGs of Illinois and Michigan. The other AGs joining this coalition are from Arizona, California, Connecticut, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.

The AGs wrote in the lawsuit that they’re suing to “protect their states and residents from unlawful action by the National Institutes of Health that will devastate critical public health research at universities and research institutions in the United States.”

“Without relief from NIH’s action, these institutions’ cutting-edge work to cure and treat human disease will grind to a halt,” the lawsuit states.

The coalition argues that tossing the indirect cost agreements violates the Administrative Procedure Act — including a directive Congress passed during Trump’s first term to fend off his earlier proposal to drastically cut research reimbursements.

That statutory language, still in effect, bans the NIH from requiring categorial and indiscriminate changes to indirect cost reimbursements, according to the suit. The coalition is seeking a court order barring the Trump administration and NIH from implementing the action.

---------

©2025 MediaNews Group, Inc. Visit at bostonherald.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.